首页> 外文OA文献 >Restrukturisasi Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat Sesudah Amandemen Undang-undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945
【2h】

Restrukturisasi Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat Sesudah Amandemen Undang-undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945

机译:印度尼西亚1945年宪法修正案后的人民协商会议改组

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Institution of the People\u27s Consultative Assembly was referred to as the supreme perpetrators of popular sovereignty even in Article 1 (2) of the Constitution of 1945 before the change formulated by the sentence: "The sovereignty of the people\u27s hands and performed entirely by the Assembly". Now, the provisions of Article 1 (2) altered its formulation into "the hands of the people\u27s sovereignty and implemented in accordance with the Constitution". The purpose of this study was, first, to know clearly the position of the Assembly before and after the amendment of the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Year 1945. Second, to determine the urgency of institutional restructuring of the People\u27s Consultative Assembly in the state system of Indonesia. Third, to determine the implications of changes in the position of the Assembly on the principle of popular sovereignty. From this research, there are three things that can be concluded, first, notch the Assembly before the amendment is the holder of the rule or the highest power. The position of the Assembly after the amendment is no longer as the highest state institution, the position of all state agencies are aligned as state institutions. Secondly, in connection with the checks and balances it is also proposed the idea of changes to the parliamentary system of the supremacy of the Assembly became the parliamentary bicameral system (two rooms) are interwoven in a relationship of checks and balances. Third, the amendment to article 1, paragraph (2) and Article 2, paragraph (1) implicated in, reposition the role of the Assembly of the highest state institutions (the supreme body) into the joint between the House of Representatives and the Regional Representatives Council. Suggestions writer, First, people\u27s Consultative Assembly session which is a joint forum of the Board of Representatives and Regional Representative Council does not need to be permanent so that more precise leadership of the Assembly ad hoc course, do not need a separate secretariat and leadership. Second, Reinforce a legislative system adopted whether unicameral system (one room) that the House of Representatives and the Regional Representatives Council remove institution or adopts a bicameral (two rooms), namely the House of Representatives and Regional Representative Council with the consequences of having a very strong position. Third, Indonesia should be able to follow the United States, on the relationship between the House of Representatives (DPR) and the senate in congress (parliament) who put both in a balanced legislative function and can perform mutual checks and balances.
机译:甚至在1945年《宪法》第1条第(2)款中,在以下措词所作出的更改之前,人民协商会议机构被称为人民主权的最高施行者:“人民的主权完全由人民行使由大会”。现在,第1条第2款的规定将其表述改为“人民的主权并根据宪法予以实施”。这项研究的目的是,首先,要清楚地了解1945年印度尼西亚共和国宪法修订前后的议会地位。其次,确定在1998年印度尼西亚协商议会进行机构重组的紧迫性。印度尼西亚的国家体系。第三,确定改变大会立场对人民主权原则的影响。从这项研究中,可以得出三点结论:第一,在修正案是规则的持有者或最高权力之前给议会开分。修正后的大会职位不再是最高的州机构,所有州机构的职位都统一为州机构。其次,关于制衡,还提出了改变议会至高无上的议会制的构想,使议会两院制(两个房间)交织成制衡关系。第三,牵涉到的第1条第(2)款和第2条第(1)款的修正案将最高州机构的议会(最高机构)的角色重新定位为众议院与地区议会之间的联合代表理事会。建议作家,第一,人大协商会议是代表理事会和区域代表理事会的联合论坛,不需要是永久性的,这样就可以更精确地领导大会特设课程,不需要单独的秘书处和领导。其次,加强立法制度,是采用众议院和地区代表理事会撤消机构的一院制(一个房间),还是采用两院制(即两个众议院),即众议院和地区代表理事会,其后果是地位很强。第三,在众议院与国会参议院(议会)之间的关系上,印度尼西亚应能够追随美国,后者既发挥平衡的立法职能,又可以进行相互制衡。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号